Snatch? No not mine.

So...

Who here is tired of reading about.. or seeing Britney's crotch?

Well... obviously not enough people are tired of or uninterested in her crotch. I mean... think about it. How many times have you seen her nether region this week?

Here's something to think about...

Almost every female on the planet has gone commando at one point (maybe more than ONE point), but the difference is that you and me, for example, we're likely only going to give our date the unintentional, but enjoyable peepshow. Or at worst, we're gonna give some random passer-by a free peek. This happens to (I think its safe to say) ALL women at least once. Period.

So I wonder... if there's no paparazzi there to capture your pussy-parade on film, is it still a pussy parade?

Mysterious.

Britney's not exactly the brightest bulb in the lamp, surely... but saying no to undies a few times in a row is really none of our concern. And also something that we've all done ourselves.

I personally think if you set up to judge someone like Britney, then judging her harshly for things like hanging out with Paris Hilton - I mean, seriously Paris makes Britney seem like a Rhodes Scholar - would make a whole lot more sense. Maybe she has a soft spot for trash? This explains her marrying trash. Who knows. She should actually be sort of admired for putting up with trash as much as she seems to.

I guess gossip is fun. I read it too, but I think that it's getting out of hand. Actually, it's been out of hand for a long LONG time. In a strange way, I thank god that "too far" now means Britney's crotch as opposed to a dead Princess, for example.

Let me ask you...

Would you like to be followed around with people snapping your photo constantly? Doubt it. How would you feel if, as a celebrity, you heading out for a good time at night with your trashy friend resulted in your crotch AND your c-section scar being published nationally? Talk about private business!

Are you gonna say, "Hey.. public figure.. that's how it is. Don't become a celeb and expect privacy"? Why not?

Do you and I OWN these people because we buy whatever it is that they do to entertain us? Do we have exclusive rights to them and their private lives? Or "private areas" as in Britney's case this past week? If any of you answered "YES", I actually think y'all got some issues. Sorry.

I do want to know about celebs, I admit it, but ya know what... I want to read about their projects, maybe a bio (where they're from.. especially fellow Canadians). I really can't figure out how crotch pics constitutes NEWS or even something interesting, but the public craves these bits of info. It's not enough to see the celebs doing whatever their talent is. It's not enough to have whatever info they actually don't mind sharing with the world. These tabloid girly bits and other ridiculous tabloid stories are what sells.

I don't know what's worse, the hunger for tabloid style info or the tabloids themselves providing said info?

Actually.. There would be no tabloids without the scandal-starved freaks of the world, so I'll blame the scandal-starved freaks.